Alright, I had to have fun with the title. :) We’re about 4 weeks ago from the newest and most unique analytics conference on the scene: X Change, hosted this year by Semphonic and Web Analytics Demystified. 

If you missed the first year in Napa, you gotta head to San Fran this year!  Allow me to explain how X Change differentiates as I see it:

• Conversational. You don’t sit in a room and listen to people drone on in front of their powerpoints.  People sit in Socratic circles and talk about a topic of interest in “huddles.”  The huddle leader will bring up a topic, perhaps riff on some hard-learned experience or data point related to the topic, and ask for commentary from the participants.  The conversation then flows, like Jazz, until there’s a cadence, then the huddle leader phrases a few more notes and progression begins again…  Its atypical format depends on participants for success.  No one is going to sit there and read you slides and provide one-sided opinions.  You won’t just be sitting there listening (unless you want to).  The best huddles are interactive and encourage active participation in the pursuit of shared knowledge, not passive reception of an individual’s knowledge.
• Focused.  The huddle topics are highly specific and deeply relevant to the real world practice of web analytics today - from attribution to mobile measurement to integration to privacy to team structure, the huddle leaders selected topics that interest them to share with the participants. The focused conversational format should lead to symbiotic exchanges of information directly relevant to your job.
• Small.  100 people, 20 huddle leaders.  You get to make meet interesting people and build working relationships with them.  Cool folks like Bob Page, Rachel Scotto, Marshall Sponder, John Lovett, Jared Waxman, “Bob” Dylan Lewis will be leading huddles and hanging out.  The Web Analytics Tuesday event will probably be bigger than the whole X Change conference!
• Exclusive.  The huddle leaders were hand selected.  In attendance will be industry leaders, corporate executives, industry analysts.  All of the attendees work with analytics.  And for gosh sake, it is at the Ritz in one of America’s most beautiful and eccentric cities. 

I think X Change is a unique experience and a worthwhile event where you get to really connect, and well, exchange (!) expertise with your peers and go home with new knowledge.  At least I did last year.  I’ll be leading a couple of huddles, one of the web analytics team and one on knowing when you’ve outgrown you analytics tool, so say hello when you see me. 

Make sure you check out the official web site at Semphonic and sign up today.  The event will sell out soon.  15% discounts are available for Web Analytics Association members. 

Next Sunday afternoon I am moderating a panel at eMetrics San Fran.  The panel is called ”Web Analytics -vs- Audience Measurement.”  Andrea Hadley at NetSetGo was the brainchild of this panel idea (and yes that is her picture on her site :).  In fact, I was a panelist on the same panel at eMetrics Toronto, filling in for my friend Marshall Sponder.  Since he’s going to be in San Fran, I yielded my seat 0n the panel and decided to stand up at the podium.   Other panelists include Jodi McDermott, Director of Product Management, at ClearSpring, and some other surprise guests (from comScore and IAB maybe)… You’ll have to show up and find out…

The panel description is as follows:

Are you confused about the number of customers visiting your website? Are the metrics reported by your web analytics tool different from the metrics reported by your online media, or by audience measurement organizations? The WAA invites eMetrics Marketing Optimization Summit attendees and the local San Francisco business community of web marketers, publishers and agencies to attend this community meeting. A panel of experts will discuss the value of the metrics, methods and tools used by web analytics practitioners, online advertising media and audience measurement organizations. Find out how-to use these metrics and tools to better understand your customers, your website’s competitive standing and overall website value.

The goals for this panel include:

• Adding clarity around the tools and data associated with each set of technology and metrics - web analytics technologies and website data, ad servers and ad data, and audience measurement tools and data.
• Learning how each data source can be used to expand our understanding of customers, how effective our website is as a business channel, the website’s competitive standing and value, and so on.
• Providing insight into the role of the web analytics practitioner and how this role is growing in importance and influence over business, marketing, product, and strategic decisions.
• Discussing the role of the Web Analytics Association (WAA) and how the WAA serves the practitioner.  That the WAA is an unbiased organization that doesn’t serve advertisers, publishers, or technology vendors, rather that the WAA serves and exists for the benefit and betterment of the the practitioner and the web marketer/strategist.
• Articulating the announcement made at eMetrics Toronto on the important collaboration between the IAB and the WAA for standards review.

My goal as the moderator is not to critique, demean, or criticize audience measurement, Internet advertising technologies, or to embellish or hype up web analytics tools.  Rather I hope to clarify the differences between the technologies and speak about the value they hold together - like I did in my article for MediaPost called the Yin and Yang of Online Metrics.

So why am I telling you all of this on my blog???  Well it’s because I really want your help, whether you are going to eMetrics or not…  Since I’m the moderator, I get to ask the questions, and I don’t want to just ask “my” questions, I want to know what questions YOU would ask if you had the chance to ask.  Of course, those of you reading this and attending the panel will be given the microphone if you raise your hand.

Please help my crowdsource by telling me in comments or via email to judah (at) webanalyticsdemystified.com:

What questions would you ask to clarify the differences and value between web analytics and audience measurement tools?

Any questions you think worth asking from “why don’t the numbers match?” to complexly “what are the differences between audience measurement and web analytics systems in terms of data collection?” would be awesome and appreciated.  Thanks in advance for your help!  I’m eager to see if this social media experiment in blog-based crowdsourcing actually works!

eMetrics Toronto is about two weeks away, and Boston Web Analytics Wednesday is tomorrow night.   I’m pretty excited for both events.  

I think eMetrics is thee premier web analytics and marketing optimization conference.  I’ve been to a bunch of them, and I always walk away with new ideas with which I can hit the ground running when I get back to work.   The real world case studies, practitioner advice, vendor spiels, and the cadre of notable analytics and marketing professionals who attend and make themselves available to you, the attendee, is unmatched.  

Web analytics pals Jim Sterne (and Andrea Hadley in Toronto) in association with Rising Media ensure the content and tracks focus on the knowledge needed today to drive the real-world application and usage of analytics and marketing measurement technologies in way that enables your online competitive advantage tomorrow.  eMetrics is far beyond a beginners conference (though there’s always plenty of good stuff for beginners).  Gone are the days talking about simple definitions and whose tool can do what (though they’ll be plenty of that stuff covered in some sessions, at lunch, in the bar).   Today’s eMetrics is focused on the application of analytics in business context, especially in the context of marketing.  The conference, as I see it, is about what you should measure and how to take action from what you measure in order to improve business performance and increase top-line revenue and bottom line profits (while reducing middle-line expenses).

I’ll be there in two sessions.  The first session I’m in is on Monday afternoon and occurs in two parts.  The first part is where I’ll fill in for my buddy Marshall Sponder, Director of the WAA and Chair of the Social Media Committee, and give an update on Social Media Committee activities.  During the second part of session, I’ll participate on a panel moderated by Chris Williams, Managing Director, Media Contacts Canada, and panelists Brent Bernie, President, comScore Inc., Paula Gignac, President, IAB Canada, and Jodi McDermott, Director, Product Management Clearspring Technologies.  We’ll be talking about the importance of standards, collaboration between industry organizations, and the real-world application of all the measurement tools you can use to run an online business (and more).

In the second session, on Wednesday afternoon, I’ll be on another panel speaking about the analysis of audience behavior and engagement levels on media and content sites.  Sitting alongside me will be moderator Mitch Joel, President, Twist Image, Sibel Satiroglu, Interactive Marketing, Hewlett Packard, and Mike Sukmanowsky, Web Analytics Specialist, Rogers Media. 

Should be some good conversation.

For those people trying to gain insights from the data, to those actively working on taking action from the the data, and for those who are trying to manage it all, I highly recommend attending one of 2008’s eMetrics Summits.  If you’re in Canada or nearby or really anywhere on Earth, now’s the time to sign up for Toronto.   

And for those in the Boston area tomorrow night (3/19), please join me at the monthly Web Analytics Wednesday I host.  This month, Jonathan Mendez, Founder of RAMP Digital, will be presenting on the “Crawl, Walk, Run” approach to onsite targeting.   Omniture is sponsoring and providing free food and drinks for all attendees, so swing by and swing back a drink whilst enjoying some smart conversation.

See you at both events.

At some point in the career of a web analyst, you will be asked to investigate, assess, and possibly judge the current state of how a company “does” web analytics.  What are some of the areas you should ask about?  Here are some thoughts and a few questions to ask to help inform your analysis (and grease your mental gears):

• Business strategy.  Why does the organization do web analytics?  What’s the goal of having a web analytics team?  Who defines the strategy?  What is the strategy?
• Analytics organization and team structure.  Who is the chief owner of web analytics?  What does the analytics team look like?  How has the team structure been formalized in the organization?  Is the web analytics team effectively staffed and have enough control over resources to do the job?
• Process.  What analytics processes have been defined?  How does a site or site feature progress from not being measured to being effectively measured?
• Data collection. What methods for data collection are being used?  How much data is being collected, and for how long is it stored, and at what level (i.e. detail, aggregate)?
• Reporting.  What data is reported?  What do the reports look like?  Who creates them?  How are they distributed, and in what format?  To whom?  When?  How?
• Analysis.  What’s the difference in this company between reporting and analysis?  How is analysis communicated to stakeholders?  When?  How?
• KPI’s.  What Key Performance Indicators are you measuring?  How are they relevant to the business?  What actions have people taken from KPI analysis that improved business performance?
• Segmentation.  What audience and customer segments exist?  What audience and customer dimensions and attributes are segmented?  Why are they meaningful to the business?  What has the business learned and what action has been taken from the current segmentation analysis strategy?
• Technology.  What analytics technologies are being used?  What does the schema for web analytics look like?  What homegrown technologies are used?  What external technologies have you bought or deployed for analytics?
• Integration.  How is web analytics data integrated with other internal and external data?  Is it integrated with other systems, how? 
• Site Optimization.  Does the company test landing pages, and/or use AB or Multivariate testing software?  If so, whose software, and what business gains have been realized?
• Advertising/Advertisers. How is analytics used to inform or enable advertisers and advertising?
• Privacy.  What safeguards does the company take in protecting analytics data? 
• Qualitative Data.  Is qualitative data contextualized with web analytics data? Do you capture voice-of-customer data?  Use Net Promoter Scores?  Have a research department?  Does web analytics collaborate with research? 

Those are just a few questions to ask.  Many others can be asked.  What would you want to know, and what would you ask?  Please leave a comment.  I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Now for some random thoughts:

• News from Orem.  API / Fusion / Video Tracking… cool.  I’m pretty psyched that Omniture announced a web services API.  That’s fantastic, and confirms how truly important integration is now and will be in the future for analytics data (as I’ve been saying for years… Google will be next). 

Omniture has announced a new methodology, Fusion, and improved capabilities for tracking video.  All sounds very exciting.  But, like Eric, I’m wondering what revolutionary new methodology Fusion really is?  Or is just what Eric’s been saying for the last 4 yearsbranded by Omniture and delivered by the Great Belkin? 

Regarding the video capabilities, I haven’t seen a real demo yet, but I wasn’t immediately impressed with what I saw on my friend Marshall’s blog.  Instead of quartile tracking, it seems like you track the playhead (the part of the video playing) across audience aggregates in increments of one-twelfth, and you get some bubbly visualization (what would that look like with 10,000 videos on your site?), and better access to forums.

I’m hoping I haven’t seen the whole ball of wax, and I look forward to Omniture giving me the grand tour. 

But for a playhead visualization, I was much more impressed with what I saw from Visible Measures and their engagement curve.  And what the heck are those folks at Divinity Metrics up to for measuring video? 

• News from Novato.  One of my favorite gangs of web analytics folks reside in Northern California.  My colleagues at Semphonic have just released a rather impressive “Omniture Implementation Toolkit.” 

I was able to procure a copy, and I’m totally impressed.  It’s full of hard-learned and hard-earned real world practitioner knowledge.  If you are trying to implement Omniture, it is well worth the money. 

Now I’m not sure if this document competes with or acts as a companion to Fusion.  All I can say is that I know the folks at Semphonic are smart, savvy, and very experienced, and there are thousands of Omniture customers out there who could benefit from this document.

• X Change Conference.  I am totally excited for X Change brought to us this year by Semphonic and Web Analytics Demystified.  The last X Change in Napa at COPIA was one of the most intimate, educational, stimulating, and enjoyable conferences that I’ve been too (and did I mention the wine?).  It was pure “class” all the way (in both the sense of style and learning, and did I mention the wine? ;-). 

This year attendance is limited to 100 folks (99 if you count me ;).  Last year, I huddled on “Deploying Measurement Systems in Globally Distributed Enterprises.”  

If you aren’t familiar with X Change or Semphonic  check them out, and make sure to read a few of my favorite bloggers - the prolific deep thinker and expert Gary Angel, the always impressive (and fun) June D(ershewitz), and bright author and web analytics veteran, Phil Kemelor.

One of my favorite personalities in Web Analytics is Phil Kemelor - author of the Web Analytics Report.  Phil is also Vice President of Strategic Consulting Services at SEMphonic and an analyst at CMS Watch. 

I first encountered Phil in late 2006 when he called me up to discuss my take on the vendor landscape at that time.  We instantly hit it off because, like him, I seek truth, and have a lot of trouble believing vendor spin and hype.   We found each other’s insights “refreshing,” and we’ve kept in touch ever since, grabbing food together/swinging back a few beers/hanging out at conferences, chatting via email, and just generally staying in touch.

Fast forward to late 2007, early 2008, when I find out that Phil was revising his awesomely comprehensive Web Analytics Report and releasing the 2.0 version.  We’ll the time has come, and WAR 2.0 is out.  If you can swing the cost (it’s over $1000 US), I highly recommend purchasing it, especially if you are new to the industry and trying to make a vendor selection, or if you are old to the industry and want to get a solid sense of current vendor capabilities.

The 343-page report goes over all sort of juicy stuff - from beginner information about “what is web analytics” to concepts around the “web analytics business case” to deeper dives into “web analytics technology.”  It covers an abundance of useful information about data collection, data sampling, data exporting, dashboarding/reporting, segmentation, licensing, organizational requirements, and how to select a web analytics vendor.  He’s also done a good job, imho, discussing 15 different vendor tools, which shows you that the vendor landscape is a lot larger than just Google Analytics and Omniture - that’s for sure.

So if you have the $$$ to spend, check it out.  It’s an excellent addition to my analytics library.  Good work, Phil!

I’ve been so busy folks, I’ve had no time to blog, so forgive me for my two week hiatus.   

The classic problem of “marketing versus IT” is real.  If you are lucky, you work with an excellent IT team (like me!), then this problem will be minimal if at all.  But in most cases, based on what I hear from my industry colleagues, the analytics team often has issues with IT resources being sufficiently delegated to supporting a web analytics implementation and program.

The classic problem goes something like this:

1. Marketing:  We need advanced customizations, deep integrations, increased scalability, better performance, and more control overall over Web Analytics.
2. IT: We don’t have resources, time, or budget to help you right now.  Fill out these forms and in the future maybe we can help.

In a nutshell, this is one of the reason why hosted solutions exist (SaaS, ASP, on-demand, whatever).  While it’s hard to do web analytics, it’s even harder to do it internally using actual software that you run.

Wouldn’t we prefer it to go something like this:

1. Marketing: We need advanced customizations, deep integrations, increased scalability, better performance, and more control overall over Web Analytics.
2. IT: Yes.  Can do.  Will do.  What do you need and when do you need them by?

My belief is that to “do web analytics” the right way, you need an allocation of IT resources to support your implementation and extend it to fulfill strategy and improve business performance.   After all, I firmly believe web analytics is for optimizing business performance, guiding strategy, and supporting tactical decisions.   And to do all that, you need resources when you need them.  The larger your site or portfolio of sites, the more resources you need.  It’s all pretty logical.  Getting back to IT, if you’re using a hosted solution, you need fewer IT resources.  The vendor takes care of a lot of IT stuff.  If you are running your analytics in-house, you need a team of IT resources because you will be doing it all yourself.  

I would prefer those technical resources report into Web Analytics, but I’m not sure if the general business world (as in non-Internet companies) sees the ROI of Web Analytics clearly enough to immediately delegate a full-time “mini IT” team to support analytics at phase zero (i.e. when you first get hired and plan the rollout).  And that’s why you need to be very wary of what vendors tell you about IT requirements and web analytics. 

If management expects that you just need to tag the pages and you the analyst can do that yourself, your company will be in for surprise.  It’s never that simple.  Smaller companies with one or a few sites that use the same technology may be able to pull off the solo cowboy analyst including tags and doing all the tech work.  Google has made that fairly easy.  But larger companies that have many sites and many different technologies serving those sites are a much different animal. 

My advice is that you can’t be fooled by vendor messaging that claims “you don’t need IT.”  That’s bull$4!+.  Marketers can’t do Web Analytics alone and in isolation.  You will need IT to help you extend your web analytics solution.   And as I’ve already stated, the level at which you need IT will vary on how you “do” web analytics.  It differs greatly if you are running an in-house proprietary solution, an internal vendor solution, or a hosted solution. 

If you are doing web analytics using a proprietary solution you created internally, you may probably then already understand what I mean when I say ”web analytics needs IT.”  Chances are you are using an OLAP-based solution that has huge BI infrastructure behind it and the cubes contain latent information.  Your data model may be limited compared to the major vendors.  Your tool may be overly complex, hard for business users to use, and limited in terms of features, or it may be the coolest thing since sliced bread, and the people who created it may know more than the vendors.  Still, unless resources are adequately delegated to support analytics and extending the implementation, your tool users and report consumers will make thousands of requests to IT, and they will go unfulfilled leading to user frustration.

If you are running an in-house software solution, such as that provided by Unica, WebTrends or Visual Sciences, you will rely on IT for all sorts of things, like hardware and software maintenance, database administration, network support, and will need to leverage help desk and ticketing systems.  In addition, web analytics projects become part of the IT project planning cycle with budget requests and consideration.

If you are having your web analytics tool hosted.  IT may be the ones who actually put the tags you field on your web site.  Modifications to any javascript may need to be done by IT.  You will need to reach out to IT for help with setting up cookies, changing the DNS, and writing any code that assists with web analytics.  “Change management” will be required. ;)

If a business wants to succeed with Web Analytics, it must determine how to effectively resource the implementation and ongoing extension of an analytics platform.  Here are some tips for ensuring you get the resources you need:

• Factor web analytics resource needs into the capital budgeting and yearly planning process.  Business stakeholders must identify the IT resources they need in advance, and then align the IT team according to business goals.  Resources must be allocated according to financial guidelines that maintain corporate profitability. 
• Document your web analytics projects and business requriements and share the documentation with IT.  Whether your web analytics projects are related to implementation, campaign optimization, data description, or integration, you need to share that information with IT so they can determine how to support analytics. 
• Identify and document why you need IT resources.   In other words, identify and document what IT will be doing for web analytics and how their work is necessary for improving corporate performance.  On the business side, explain that you won’t be able to fulfill X business goal without IT resources.
• Leverage a project manager.  Project managers are critical and important to cross-functional team success.  They focus work, align people, determine tasks, monitor completion, and allow a multifaceted team of business marketers and IT to do what they do without worrying about managing the project.
• Share your analytics success with IT and let stakeholders know how IT has helped you.  Often times corporations forget that these very talented IT folks are working really hard behind the scenes, often without getting much (or any) credit for the complex work they do.  When you have an analytics success, share it with the folks that helped you tag the pages or configure your servers.  When people are singing your praises in the cafeteria because they now have the data they need to do their jobs and/or you’ve improved their business performance, let them know IT backed you up and helped you deliver.  There’s enough glory to go around.

If you do what I’m saying in this blogviation, the problem  of ”marketing versus IT” will be minimized.  IT will be able to keep up with all of your constantly-evolving business requirements and the dynamic, high-maintenance nature of your web analytics program.   And your marketing department, business stakeholders, and executive team will be very happy with the results. 

If you’re new to web analytics, or the management of web analytics, it’s always helpful to get advice from someone whose been in the industry.  Here are a couple of simple principles I’ve found helpful:

• Investigate and be skeptical of claims by vendors. Upgrading a tool?  Migrating to a new tool?  Completely replacing one?  Adding a tool to your analytics arsenal?   Someone is then trying to sell you something.  Vendors really want your money.  And when it comes down to it, it seems the bigger the vendor and the smaller you are, the less attention you will get, even when you need their help really badly.  Vendors attempt to have their own, differentiated spin on web analytics - one of the reason the WAA developed standards.  Avoid falling into the mental model of any one vendor… push their envelope… champion for standards.  In doing so, make sure to realize that a good relationship with a vendor based on an understanding of mutual strengths and weaknesses will lead to collaboration important to your success.
• Don’t bias yourself when it comes to data collection.  Page tags are imperfect.  Orchestrating and maintaining comprehensive, deep tagging is never easy.  Log file analysis, while often disdained, has utility for situations where page tags are insufficient (say you want to detect how search bots crawl your site) or when tags are impractical (mobile).  Packet sniffing can be beneficial when you can’t tag or access log files.  In fact, some combination of hybrid data collection, for example page tags and logs, might be the best option for a given situation.  It’s up to you to work with your team to determine what method is most appropriate to use to reach your goals. 
• Realize that your IT department is your ally.  Marketers can’t do web analytics without IT.  Whether they help you include page tags, locate and synch your log files, or monitor the implementation of your packet sniffer, you will need to develop and maintain a relationship with IT.  You, the business marketer, may think quite differently about web analytics than IT, so work toward a mutual understanding that supports business and technology goals.
• Reconcile what it means to you when you hear that “Web Analytics isn’t easy… Web Analytics is hard!”  That’s a quote from Eric T Peterson.  He’s right.  You need people, processes, workflows, dedicated resources, teamwork, teamwork, teamwork.  How do you prepare an organization for something that is hard?  How do you prepare a team?   Training, education, evangelism?  Yes, that helps… You can make it easier by reading the books, checking out the blogs, going to the conferences, taking a UBC course, and participating in industy organizations like the Web Analytics Association.   

Web analytics tools can be outgrown by companies, just like pants can be outgrown by people.  Over time, an analytics tool may no longer fit organizational needs or be well suited to deliver on complex organizational requirements for site optimization and multichannel integration (among other things). 

This topic led me Silicon Valley this week thanks to an invitation from Unica I headed over to Webex headquarters to record a preso in their new LiveStream studios.  A few other folks also participated in the production.  In attendance was Fireclick founder and all around cool guy, Steve O’Brien (also VP Internet Marketing at Unica), my pal and fellow blogger, Avinash Kaushik (of ZQ Insights and MarketMotive), the genial Elana Anderson (founder of NxtERA marketing and former VP Marketing Research at Forrester), the excellent bloke and all around nice guy from across the pond, Dr Alan Hall (Director of Analytics at SCL Analytics), forthcoming author and savvy multichannel marketer, Akin Arikan (Analytics Evangelist at Unica), and the jet-setting smarty Karen Hudgins (marketer at Unica).   We all had a blast getting down to business at Webex studios.  And eating at places like Burk’s and Parcel 104 - both excellent restaurants.

The title of my preso was “Symptoms you’ve Outgrown your Web Analytics Tool,” such as:

• Inadequate segmentation
• Poor visualization
• No custom reporting
• Limited Integration (covered in Part 2)
• Cost (covered in Part 2)

While I did manuscript the speech (hey I was being recorded!), it’s way too long to post, so I figured you all might enjoy me paraphrasing my own content.  So as I sit here on a Jetblue redeye, here it goes:

• Inadequate Segmentation.  Segmentation in web analytics describes the activity of categorizing and dividing your online audience and customers by their various attributes.  For example, you might choose to segment your audience based on their demographic location information to determine if a visitors from a certain geography have a higher conversion rate or behave differently on your site than visitors from another geography.  Or you may choose to use your web analytics tool to define a segment that you want to track such as visitors who clicked on a paid search term and did not convert, but came back to the site within one week.  Sounds easy, right? 

But not all web analytics tools can segment data.  The proprietary tool you run in-house may not be able to segment data.  Your expensive vendor solution may not be able to segment data easily.  Many tools only provide simple reports.  Yet basic reporting is insufficient for web analytics.  In order to understand new data relationships and the effectiveness of marketing campaigns to your massive online audience, you need to a web analytics tool that can segment data.

The idea being to do what I describe in this post on web analytics segmentation:

• Define a segment
• Identify expected segment behavior. 
• Measure current segment behavior. 
• Create “optimization hypotheses.” 
• Optimize content, offerings, user experience, and other site elements. 

How does your web analytics tool fit into the process of segementation that I described?  Does it?  Can your tool assist you in this process?  If not, you may have a nice IT tool that reports web metrics, not a marketing tool that enables you to optimize your site and landing pages to offer the best possible messages to known online segments.

• Poor Visualization.  Pictures are worth a thousand words.  Your stakeholders are already overwhelmed with data before ever presenting reports with a whole bunch of numbers.  Not everyone is quantitative.  Some stakeholders just want to be able to quickly digest data, and they prefer an aesthetically pleasing visualization instead of a spreadsheet. 

Data visualization helps stakeholders interpret important data at a glance.  Visualization helps reporting comprehension.  Good visualizations are important when you want to:

• Highlight key trends in the data
• Compare counts of things
• Identify multidimensional relationships using cube visualizations

If your tool can’t visualize your web analytics data, and you need that visualized data to assist comprehension, act as sales tool in a presentation, or as marketing collateral in a report, you have outgrown your web analytics tool.

• No Custom Reporting.  An acute inability to deliver customized reporting that meets the needs a diverse group of stakeholders is one of the signs you’ve outgrown your current web analytics tool.  The problem manifests itself in sheer frustration because people can’t get the data they need. Over time this will cause people to lose faith in web analytics because the data isn’t relevant to their jobs.  Some of the symptoms include:
  • Problems creating KPI’s.  To manage online performance, you need to be able to define Key Performance Indicators.  For example, you may want to define a view:visit ratio, that is the number of page views generated per visit.  You need to define this equation in your web analytics tool.  If you can’t define such simple KPI’s, you are limiting your success at web analytics.
  • You may not have reporting that identifies conversion rates and allows you to define custom metrics for channels like RSS, Newsletters, and Internal and External Search.  A powerful web analytics tool will be able to build custom reporting for conversion rates and other KPI’s by online channel.
  • You may have a limited ability to build reports with filtered data, such as viewing reporting of top pages on a particular day or combinations of days, or filtering data by referrer, geography, or time.
  • No ability to add core web analytics dimensions to your reports, such as creating and saving a report that shows all referrers, their keywords, conversion and bounce rates for each city in the United States.
  • Quite simply, you may only have one set of reports and you can’t build new ones at all.

In the real world practice of web analytics, you need a web analytics tool that has the ability to build as many custom reports as you want when doing analysis, to filter, add metrics, to use dimensions, do AB tests, and save all that stuff until your heart is content so you can meet business goals.  You can’t be restrained by the inability of your current tool to create custom reports. If you are you may have outgrown your web analytics tool.

I’ll post part 2 this weekend as I recover from the jet lag…     Part 2 is up, click here to view it! 

Eric Peterson of Web Analytics Demystified invites all practitioners, vendors, and consultants to participate in the Fall 2007 Web Analytics Demystified Survey.  This season’s survey focuses on web analytics tools and examines distribution of deployment and overall satisfaction.

It takes about 15 minutes to complete.  As an incentive Eric Peterson is offering a 50% discount on his Big Book of KPI’s. 

And the big bonus is that all the resulting research will be made available on the WAD site for free (the Spring 2007 survey research is here).  Please lend your voice at:

Take the Web Analytics Demystified Fall 2007 Survey Right Now!

Forrester’s Megan Burns is seeking ALL web analytics consultants to complete this 10-minute survey:

http://globaltestmarket.com/survey/s.phtml?sn=86482&lang=E&secid=0fd357

Megan will be publishing a list of every web analytics consulting firm later this year.

In addition, if you would like to meet Megan in person, listen to her speak, ask her questions, and receive a FREE copy of Forrester’s Web Analytics Vendor Evaluation (the $995 Wave), you should attend the Boston Web Analytics Wednesday I host every month.  Sign up to attend the event in Cambridge MA on 10/24:

http://www.webanalyticsdemystified.com/wednesday/?event_id=2102