<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inspired by User Generated Content, Web Analytics, and Wine&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html</link>
	<description>Judah Phillips, Web Analytics Practitioner at Web Analytics Demystified</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Judah Phillips at Web Analytics Demystified &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web Analytics for Facebook: Applications, FBML, and Facebook Engagement!?&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Judah Phillips at Web Analytics Demystified &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web Analytics for Facebook: Applications, FBML, and Facebook Engagement!?&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 07:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-438</guid>
		<description>[...] agree with Jeremiah Owyang that Facebook may have their terms confused.  These metrics measure Interaction.  Where are the frequency and time measures necessary for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] agree with Jeremiah Owyang that Facebook may have their terms confused.  These metrics measure Interaction.  Where are the frequency and time measures necessary for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judah Phillips at Web Analytics Demystified &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Thoughts on Web Analytics and Social Networks&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Judah Phillips at Web Analytics Demystified &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Thoughts on Web Analytics and Social Networks&#8230;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-128</guid>
		<description>[...] where visitors who have performed the most/least interactions and contributions &#8221;go next&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] where visitors who have performed the most/least interactions and contributions &#8221;go next&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Waisberg</title>
		<link>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Waisberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 09:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Jim and Judah,

IMHO, one insightful and actionable information that can be extracted from UGC measurement is the crawlability of the website.

For example, I can track the number of comments-documents-folders created by users and see if they are affecting the crawlers’ rate in the website. It is known that the more content, the more crawlable the website (of course this is not the only parameter, but it is an important one). Moreover, I track if more people are coming from Search Engines as a result of higher indexing and analyze the performance of these additional people in the website.

How does it sound?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim and Judah,</p>
<p>IMHO, one insightful and actionable information that can be extracted from UGC measurement is the crawlability of the website.</p>
<p>For example, I can track the number of comments-documents-folders created by users and see if they are affecting the crawlers’ rate in the website. It is known that the more content, the more crawlable the website (of course this is not the only parameter, but it is an important one). Moreover, I track if more people are coming from Search Engines as a result of higher indexing and analyze the performance of these additional people in the website.</p>
<p>How does it sound?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Waisberg</title>
		<link>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Waisberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 08:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Jim and Judah,

IMHO, one insightful and actionable information that can be extracted from UGC measurement is the crawlability of the website.

For example, I can track the number of comments-documents-folders created by users and see if they are affecting the crawlers' rate in the website. It is known that the more content, the more crawlable the website (of course these are not the only parameters, but they are important ones). Moreover, I track if more people are coming from Search Engines as a result of higher indexing and analyze the performance of this additional people in the website.

How does it sound?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim and Judah,</p>
<p>IMHO, one insightful and actionable information that can be extracted from UGC measurement is the crawlability of the website.</p>
<p>For example, I can track the number of comments-documents-folders created by users and see if they are affecting the crawlers&#8217; rate in the website. It is known that the more content, the more crawlable the website (of course these are not the only parameters, but they are important ones). Moreover, I track if more people are coming from Search Engines as a result of higher indexing and analyze the performance of this additional people in the website.</p>
<p>How does it sound?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inspired by User Generated Content, Web Analytics, and Wine… &#187; SHARING IDEA WEBLOG</title>
		<link>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Inspired by User Generated Content, Web Analytics, and Wine… &#187; SHARING IDEA WEBLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 15:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] post by Judah Phillips at Web Analytics Demystified and software by Elliott Back    &#160;   &#171; Tadigm Marketers. The Latter Combine The Discipli [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] post by Judah Phillips at Web Analytics Demystified and software by Elliott Back    &nbsp;   &laquo; Tadigm Marketers. The Latter Combine The Discipli [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judah</title>
		<link>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Judah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 03:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Hi Daniel:  Cool site.  It does make sense, and what an interesting idea!  Sounds like you are having a good time doing cutting edge work.  Another idea to explore with your model is influence, which I think "linkability" is a one of the measures.  For example, is the UGC influencing purchasing behavior or encouraging contributions?  Are consumers directly responding to the UGC, and/or is it building brand awareness?  In addition, by identifying common themes in contributed content, you could start to build tools for UGC creation, turning eSnips into a platform for UGC creation...  Have fun!   

Thanks Jim.  As a fellow data junkie, I like to know as much as can (even if it's just "nice" :).  I also think the model speaks to actionability.  Like I mentioned to Daniel above, by understanding the types of contributions and content, you can start to build the "platform" for UGC creation. By looking at the ratios of contributions, comments, or the impact of personas, you can promote key content creators and their output to prominent areas on the site, enabling them to have a stronger voice for driving your revenue model.  One could tailor site effectiveness (persuasion architecture anyone?), and begin to identify content syndication networks and affiliate relationships. With value scoring, you also lay the groundwork for propensity modeling.

Thanks Todd!  As a person who employees hybrid data collection (tag and logs), I think you bring up an excellent point that many web analytics vendors can't accomplish: the detection and reporting of spider and bot activity.  Certainly, a good SEO knows how the bots are (and are not) indexing the site.  It seems logical to me to extend such non-human traffic metrics to UGC in context with how your site ranks in the SERP's for keywords in the content of the pages with your UGC that crawled by bots.  Thanks for sharing your ideas!  And welcome to the blogosphere!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daniel:  Cool site.  It does make sense, and what an interesting idea!  Sounds like you are having a good time doing cutting edge work.  Another idea to explore with your model is influence, which I think &#8220;linkability&#8221; is a one of the measures.  For example, is the UGC influencing purchasing behavior or encouraging contributions?  Are consumers directly responding to the UGC, and/or is it building brand awareness?  In addition, by identifying common themes in contributed content, you could start to build tools for UGC creation, turning eSnips into a platform for UGC creation&#8230;  Have fun!   </p>
<p>Thanks Jim.  As a fellow data junkie, I like to know as much as can (even if it&#8217;s just &#8220;nice&#8221; :).  I also think the model speaks to actionability.  Like I mentioned to Daniel above, by understanding the types of contributions and content, you can start to build the &#8220;platform&#8221; for UGC creation. By looking at the ratios of contributions, comments, or the impact of personas, you can promote key content creators and their output to prominent areas on the site, enabling them to have a stronger voice for driving your revenue model.  One could tailor site effectiveness (persuasion architecture anyone?), and begin to identify content syndication networks and affiliate relationships. With value scoring, you also lay the groundwork for propensity modeling.</p>
<p>Thanks Todd!  As a person who employees hybrid data collection (tag and logs), I think you bring up an excellent point that many web analytics vendors can&#8217;t accomplish: the detection and reporting of spider and bot activity.  Certainly, a good SEO knows how the bots are (and are not) indexing the site.  It seems logical to me to extend such non-human traffic metrics to UGC in context with how your site ranks in the SERP&#8217;s for keywords in the content of the pages with your UGC that crawled by bots.  Thanks for sharing your ideas!  And welcome to the blogosphere!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 23:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Nice collection of UGC dimensions &#38; metrics!  I like Daniel's mention of content relevancy/strength, it got me thinking about how relevancy/strength of content might be quantified through log data.  Definitely one of the good cases for tracking spider activity, and most ideas are based around referrer parsing or even converting content into easier to munch weighted keywords. 

In my most humble of opinions I'd say that these are nice to know, better to trend, and it would seem that this analysis could trigger any number of usability and marketing actions.  From there, for the most part the usual suspects of web analytics apply.

Thanks again Judah for the detailed UGC post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice collection of UGC dimensions &amp; metrics!  I like Daniel&#8217;s mention of content relevancy/strength, it got me thinking about how relevancy/strength of content might be quantified through log data.  Definitely one of the good cases for tracking spider activity, and most ideas are based around referrer parsing or even converting content into easier to munch weighted keywords. </p>
<p>In my most humble of opinions I&#8217;d say that these are nice to know, better to trend, and it would seem that this analysis could trigger any number of usability and marketing actions.  From there, for the most part the usual suspects of web analytics apply.</p>
<p>Thanks again Judah for the detailed UGC post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Novo</title>
		<link>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Novo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Good logic and thoughts on the metrics.

Question is, after you have the metrics and trends, what do you "do* with them, how do you *take action* against them to improve them?

Or are they just "nice to know"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good logic and thoughts on the metrics.</p>
<p>Question is, after you have the metrics and trends, what do you &#8220;do* with them, how do you *take action* against them to improve them?</p>
<p>Or are they just &#8220;nice to know&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Waisberg</title>
		<link>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Waisberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 06:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://judah.webanalyticsdemystified.com/2007/04/inspired-by-user-generated-content-web-analytics-and-wine.html#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hi Judah,

very interesting post, this is something that I have been studying a lot. I am the Web Analyst/SEO manager for http://www.esnips.com and UGC is our core business.

eSnips members can upload and share any file type from their profile, in folders representing different areas of interest, and can determine the audience for each folder. eSnips has approximately 7 million public pages divided in the following way: 2.2 million profiles (one for each registered user), 4 million public files, and 1 million public folders. All of this is UGC.

Three important categories of metrics that IMHO are really important to be measured are:

1- Quantity of content uploaded: be it in the form of files, folders, descriptions, or comments [increases traffic and overall content].

2- Content linkability: through comments, favorites, widgets, or bookmarks [increases ENGAGEMENT (this one is for Eric :-)].

3- Content strength: text that matches the business objectives and audience desired by the company (in other words, content containing targeted keywords that will be crawled by Google/Yahoo/... and indexed highly in their search).

All three categories above help increasing SEO and engagement of existing users. Does it make sense to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Judah,</p>
<p>very interesting post, this is something that I have been studying a lot. I am the Web Analyst/SEO manager for <a href="http://www.esnips.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.esnips.com</a> and UGC is our core business.</p>
<p>eSnips members can upload and share any file type from their profile, in folders representing different areas of interest, and can determine the audience for each folder. eSnips has approximately 7 million public pages divided in the following way: 2.2 million profiles (one for each registered user), 4 million public files, and 1 million public folders. All of this is UGC.</p>
<p>Three important categories of metrics that IMHO are really important to be measured are:</p>
<p>1- Quantity of content uploaded: be it in the form of files, folders, descriptions, or comments [increases traffic and overall content].</p>
<p>2- Content linkability: through comments, favorites, widgets, or bookmarks [increases ENGAGEMENT (this one is for Eric :-)].</p>
<p>3- Content strength: text that matches the business objectives and audience desired by the company (in other words, content containing targeted keywords that will be crawled by Google/Yahoo/&#8230; and indexed highly in their search).</p>
<p>All three categories above help increasing SEO and engagement of existing users. Does it make sense to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
